 |
CPLR 3212
Rule 3212. Motion for summary judgment
(a) Time; kind of action. Any
party may move for summary judgment in any action, after issue has
been joined; provided however, that the court may set a date after
which no such motion may be made, such date being no earlier than
thirty days after the filing of the note of issue. If no such date
is set by the court, such motion shall be made no later than one
hundred twenty days after the filing of the note of issue, except
with leave of court on good cause shown.
(b) Supporting proof; grounds; relief
to either party. A motion for summary judgment shall be supported
by affidavit, by a copy of the pleadings and by other available
proof, such as depositions and written admissions. The affidavit
shall be by a person having knowledge of the facts; it shall recite
all the material facts; and it shall show that there is no defense
to the cause of action or that the cause of action or defense has
no merit. The motion shall be granted if, upon all the papers and
proof submitted, the cause of action or defense shall be established
sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing
judgment in favor of any party. Except as provided in subdivision
(c) of this rule the motion shall be denied if any party shall show
facts sufficient to require a trial of any issue of fact. If it
shall appear that any party other than the moving party is entitled
to a summary judgment, the court may grant such judgment without
the necessity of a cross-motion.
(c) Immediate trial. If it appears
that the only triable issues of fact arising on a motion for summary
judgment relate to the amount or extent of damages, or if the motion
is based on any of the grounds enumerated in subdivision (a) or
(b) of rule 3211, the court may, when appropriate for the expeditious
disposition of the controversy, order an immediate trial of such
issues of fact raised by the motion, before a referee, before the
court, or before the court and a jury, whichever may be proper.
[(d) Repealed.]
(e) Partial summary judgment; severance.
In a matrimonial action summary judgment may not be granted in favor
of the non-moving party. In any other action summary judgment may
be granted as to one or more causes of action, or part thereof,
in favor of any one or more parties, to the extent warranted, on
such terms as may be just. The court may also direct:
1. that the cause of action as to which summary judgment is granted
shall be severed from any remaining cause of action; or
2. that the entry of the summary judgment shall be held in abeyance
pending the determination of any remaining cause of action.
(f) Facts unavailable to opposing party.
Should it appear from affidavits submitted in opposition to the
motion that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but
cannot then be stated, the court may deny the motion or may order
a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or disclosure
to be had and may make such other order as may be just.
(g) Limitation of issues of fact for
trial. If a motion for summary judgment is denied or is granted
in part, the court, by examining the papers before it and, in the
discretion of the court, by interrogating counsel, shall, if practicable,
ascertain what facts are not in dispute or are incontrovertible.
It shall thereupon make an order specifying such facts and they
shall be deemed established for all purposes in the action. The
court may make any order as may aid in the disposition of the action.
(h) Standards for summary judgment
in certain cases involving public petition and participation.
A motion for summary judgment, in which the moving party has demonstrated
that the action, claim, cross claim or counterclaim subject to the
motion is an action involving public petition and participation,
as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section seventy-six-a
of the civil rights law, shall be granted unless the party responding
to the motion demonstrates that the action, claim, cross claim or
counterclaim has a substantial basis in fact and law or is supported
by a substantial argument for an extension, modification or reversal
of existing law. The court shall grant preference in the hearing
of such motion.
(i) Standards for summary judgment
in certain cases involving licensed architects, engineers, land
surveyors or landscape architects. A motion for summary judgment,
in which the moving party has demonstrated that the action, claim,
cross claim or counterclaim subject to the motion is an action in
which a notice of claim must be served on a licensed architect,
engineer, land surveyor or landscape architect pursuant to the provisions
of subdivision one of section two hundred fourteen of this chapter,
shall be granted unless the party responding to the motion demonstrates
that a substantial basis in fact and in law exists to believe that
the performance, conduct or omission complained of such licensed
architect, engineer, land surveyor or landscape architect or such
firm as set forth in the notice of claim was negligent and that
such performance, conduct or omission was a proximate cause of personal
injury, wrongful death or property damage complained of by the claimant
or is supported by a substantial argument for an extension, modification
or reversal of existing law. The court shall grant a preference
in the hearing of such motion.
|
 |