|
Appearing on an HP Case: DHPD Initiated
Action
In General
Respondent/Owner’s Answer or
Appearance
Courtroom Procedure
Trial
Inquest
Judgment
In General
The law requires that an owner maintain adequate services, and
to keep a building and apartment in good repair. An inspector may
be sent out by DHPD to see if the owner is providing essential services
such as heat, hot water, or extermination, and is making repairs
such as leaky faucets, faulty electrical outlets or peeling paint
and plaster. If an inspector goes out to a premises and finds that
the owner is not maintaining the building and apartment, the inspector
will place violations against the building.
If an inspector does go out and places a violation against the
building, the violation can be classified in three different ways:
"A" violations are nonhazardous and must be corrected
within 90 days.
"B" violations are hazardous and must be corrected within
30 days.
"C" violations are immediately hazardous and must be corrected
within 24 hours.

Respondent/Owner’s
Answer or Appearance
If you are the respondent or owner and have been served with an
order to show cause starting
an HP case against you, you must appear in court on the date and
time stated in the order to show cause. When your case is called,
you will have a chance to raise before the judge any affirmative
defenses you have.
Your possible defenses may include:
• lack of jurisdiction
• that the conditions alleged do not constitute a violation
of the Housing Maintenance Code or other laws relating to housing
standards
• economic infeasibility.
In defense of your liability for civil penalties you may show:
• you timely corrected the violation and filed a certificate
of compliance, or
• that the violation did not exist at the time the notice
of violation was served.
In mitigation of your
liability you may show that:
• although you quickly tried to correct the violation, you
could not complete it in time due to technical difficulties
• you were unable to obtain necessary materials, funds or
labor, or gain access
• you made a diligent and prompt application to get a permit
or a license necessary to correct the violation, but you were unsuccessful
• the violation was caused by the act or negligence, neglect
or abuse of another not in your employ or subject to your direction.

Courtroom Procedure
Inspectors from DHPD visit buildings either on requests by tenants
or as part of the regular inspection cycles. After an inspector
finds a violation of the Housing Maintenance Code, he or she will
record it, report it to DHPD, and DHPD will inform the landlord
by sending him or her a Notice of Violation. This notice allows
a certain amount of time, depending on the type of violation
for the landlord to correct the violation and certify that it has
been corrected to DHPD. If the landlord corrects the violation and
so certifies to DHPD in a timely manner, the violation will be deemed
corrected. If the landlord does not correct the violation, or corrects
it but fails to certify the correction to DHPD, DHPD may sue the
landlord for the failure to correct, for the failure to certify
the correction, or for late certification. The suit may be over
one, several, or building-wide violations. DHPD also sues over lack
or insufficient heat and hot water.
When the landlord is sued by DHPD, the case is normally begun by
the filing and service of a notice
of petition and petitions,
or sometimes by order to show cause and petition. Section 110 of
the Civil Court Act specifies who may be served
in this kind of case. The Order to Show Cause or notice of petition
will specify a date for the landlord to appear in court. If the
landlord appears, an attorney from DHPD will try to negotiate a
settlement. When the case is settled the first time, the stipulation
will normally provide for an order
to correct with and may provide for a payment of money. If the
violations are not corrected, and the respondent is brought back
to court, DHPD will normally require money penalties as part of
any further settlement. If the respondent does not agree to a settlement,
a trial must be held.

Trial
In the trial, the DHPD will have to show that a violation was placed,
that a notice of violation was served on the landlord, managing
agent, etc., and that the certificate of correction was not filed
in a timely manner. In defense of the claims by DHPD, the respondent
may introduce evidence showing his or her lack of responsibility
as set forth in Respondent/Owners
Answer or Appearance.

Inquest
If the respondent fails to appear, the attorney for DHPD will request
an inquest. In this inquest DHPD will have to show that the violation
was placed, the notice of violation was served, the petition and
notice were served, there was no certification of correction, and
the specific time and class of each violation.

Judgment
After an inquest or a trial, if the petitioner proves his or her
case, the court may order a judgment for money and an order
to correct. The paperwork will be prepared for the judge to
sign, and a copy of the judgment will be served on the respondent.
The order to correct will serve as the basis for future contempt
proceedings, and the judgment will be executed against the respondent.
|